Petição Pública
Criar Petição
Login ou Registar
procurar
Razões para assinar. O que dizem os signatários.
A opinião e razões dos signatários da Petição:
Pela Defesa da Imagem e Reputação de Portugal junto dos Investidores Internacionais
, para Exmo. Senhor Presidente da República, Exmo. Senhor Presidente da Assembleia da República, Exmo. Senhor Primeiro-Ministro
Nome
Comentário
Rui R.
Pais de terceiro mundo .péssima imagem mudar as regras a meio do jogo . Passem para o interior então sempre entra dinheiro na economia.
Yang L.
It is totally unfair to GV applicants with the current proposal. My parents would not have invested in Portugal and applied the GV in the first place if such had been known as they are unable to stay for 183 days in Portugal due to their job nature. The whole scheme would be a scam and a shame to the Portugal government.
Yang L.
I strongly object to the change of requirement from 14 days every 2 years to 183 days proposed by the government as this is totally unacceptable and unfair to the existing GV applicants.
Yang L.
The change of requirement from 14 days every 2 years to 183 days is totally unacceptable and this is unfair to the existing GV applicants. I strongly object to this proposal!
Hui A.
I am an existing GV applicant from Hong Kong. I have been eagerly waiting for my biometrics appointment since my pre-approval 2 years ago. It is very alarming to me that suddenly the government proposes to change the requirement for renewal of the residence card that we need to stay for 183 days in Portugal, which is impossible for a global investor like me. It is totally unfair to us as when we apply the requirement is only 14 days in 2 years. I would not have invested in Portugal and purchased the property and applied the GV in the first place if such had been known. I will have no choice but to sell and sue the government for any losses incurred caused by this unacceptable change.
Ivo C.
Definitivamente os planos tem de ser reavaliados e ajustados as novas necessidades, tempo de gerir e politizar com a devida calma e serenidade e não de criar leis a pressa ou gerir o país com base na informação das capas de jornais!
Wang P.
I am an existing GV candidate from Hong Kong. I still haven't even receive my biometric appointment. It is unfair that now the Government suddenly changes rules and requiring us to stay 183 days in Portugal, which was not the rule when I first apply. I would not have applied the GV if such had been known in the first place. I will have no choice but to sell my property and sue the government for any losses incurred caused by this sudden change by the Government.
Manuela G.
Muito importante
Ko Y.
I strongly object the amendment of the stay of 183 days per year for those approved case, this is totally a breach of the contract that we signed for the Golden Visa. It would be a fraud if the terms and conditions changed unilaterally without the consent from the investors who already paid hundred thousand dollars.
Ngan K.
I strongly object the amendment of the stay of 183 days per year for those approved case, this is totally a breach of the contract that we signed for the Golden Visa. It would be a fraud if the terms and conditions changed unilaterally without the consent from the investors who already paid hundred thousand dollars.
Ko h.
I strongly object the amendment of the stay of 183 days per year for those approved case, this is totally a breach of the contract that we signed for the Golden Visa. It would be a fraud if the terms and conditions changed unilaterally without the consent from the investors who already paid hundred thousand dollars.
Chan C.
It is totally unfair to existing investors / residency card holders if the GV scheme terms at the time they applied are changed without their consent.
Ko p.
I strongly object the amendment of the stay of 183 days per year for those approved case, this is totally a violation of the contract that we signed for the Golden Visa. It would be a fraud if the terms and conditions changed unilaterally without the consent from the investors who already paid hundred thousand dollars.
Jaime Y.
I do not agree on the retroactivity for Portuguese Golden Visa holder to be changed to entrepreneurial programme. It is unconstitutional. I also feel that the Feb 16 deadline is totally unfair and unconstitutional
Maria O.
Apoio a iniciativa de modo a que possamos ganhar o respeito junto dos investidores internacionais
Elio F.
Uma vergonha essa Mais Habitação e Menos Portugal
Siu L.
The retrospective effects of this new legal regime will lead to injustice, and shall not be passed.
Lo V.
Dear Sir l Madam, Respectfully I would like to request the Portugal Government to honor the committed golden visa application including both new and subsequent renewal without changing the the requirement from current 7 -1 4 days to 183 physical day requirement. It’s the strong reputation of Portugal for her legal system, safety of the environment and fairness of the country and leaders attracted us to invest heavily from the application, pls continue to practice this virtue and tell the world how beautiful Portugal is.
Chun W.
The retrospective effects of this new legal regime will lead to injustice, and shall not be passed.
Wong W.
Eu sou um candidato GV existente de Hong Kong. Fiz minha biometria em março de 2022 e ainda nem recebi meu cartão rosa. Se houvesse novas regras exigindo que ficássemos 183 dias em Portugal ao renovar o cartão rosa, isso criaria um fator de hardship para eu cumprir. Não é justo com os candidatos GV existentes. Eu nunca teria aplicado o GV se tal condição fosse conhecida em primeiro lugar. Não terei escolha a não ser vender a propriedade e processar o governo por quaisquer perdas incorridas causadas pela solicitação do GV. I am an existing GV candidate from Hong Kong. I took my biometrics in March 2022 and I still haven't even received my pink card. If there were new rules requiring us to stay 183 days in Portugal when renewing the pink card, that would create a hardship factor for me to comply with. It's not fair to existing GV candidates. I would never have applied the GV if such a condition had been known in the first place. I will have no choice but to sell the property and sue the government for any losses incurred caused by the GV application.
anterior
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
...
18
seguinte
Assinaram a petição
4 684
Pessoas
Assinar Petição
O seu apoio é muito importante. Apoie esta causa. Assine a Petição.
Ler texto da Petição
Lista de todas as assinaturas
